Subject: Re: jadetex error (babel related?) From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 22:44:10 -0500 |
I don't know a lot about TeX packaging. I'm wondering if there is a way to make a single package file that includes everything JadeTex depends upon. I wouldn't personally care if it was 500K or 5MB if it allowed me to set up a system without chasing all over the Internet and issuing cryptic commands. Of course for the TeX experts a "standalone" JadeTex would probably continue to be most appropriate. But I think that there are a lot of mere mortals who just want to print on Unix and would rather spend an afternoon downloading redundant code in the background rather than actively chasing down components. Paul Prescod -- http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco Art is always at peril in universities, where there are so many people, young and old, who love art less than argument, and dote upon a text that provides the nutritious pemmican on which scholars love to chew. -- Robertson Davies in "The Cunning Man" DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: jadetex error (babel related?), Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: jadetex error (babel related?), Sebastian Rahtz |
SGML declaration and Latin1, Jose Carlos Ramalho | Date | Re: jadetex error (babel related?), D. Michael McFarland |
Month |