Subject: Re: Border resolution question From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 07:10:43 +0700 |
Kathleen Marszalek wrote: > > Hmm ... I'm still not satisfied:) We have: > > 12.6.27.7 > > If there are conflicting borders of equal priority one from a table-border > and one from a cell-border, the one from the table-border should win. > > If there are conflicting borders of equal priority, one with > border-present?: #t and one with border-present?: #f, the one with > border-present?: #t should win. > > And now cosider this: > > <table> > <table.before-column-border border-present="false"/> > ... > <table-cell column-number="1" ...> > <table-cell.before-column-border border-present="true"/> > ... > > .... both these rules can be applied to this example, and depending on which > rule will be applied one will get different results. Which rule has higher > priority? The second. This makes simple things work in the expected way. James DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Border resolution question, Kathleen Marszalek | Thread | Style Sheet for FOT, Russell Steven Shawn |
Re: Architectural Forms, separation, Peter Newcomb | Date | Re: Style Sheet for FOT, Paul Prescod |
Month |