Re: Border resolution question

Subject: Re: Border resolution question
From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 07:10:43 +0700
Kathleen Marszalek wrote:
> 
> Hmm ... I'm still not satisfied:)  We have:
> 
> 12.6.27.7
> 
> If there are conflicting borders of equal priority one from a table-border
> and one from a cell-border, the one from the table-border should win.
> 
> If there are conflicting borders of equal priority, one with
> border-present?: #t and one with border-present?: #f, the one with
> border-present?: #t should win.
> 
> And now cosider this:
> 
> <table>
> <table.before-column-border border-present="false"/>
> ...
> <table-cell column-number="1" ...>
> <table-cell.before-column-border border-present="true"/>
>  ...
> 
> .... both these rules can be applied to this example, and depending on which
> rule will be applied one will get different results.  Which rule has higher
> priority?

The second.  This makes simple things work in the expected way.

James


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread
  • Border resolution question
    • Kathleen Marszalek - from mail1.ability.netby web4-1.ability.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA14377Wed, 6 May 1998 09:10:57 -0400 (EDT)
      • James Clark - from mail1.ability.netby web4-1.ability.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA14846Wed, 6 May 1998 09:29:52 -0400 (EDT)
      • <Possible follow-ups>
      • Kathleen Marszalek - from mail1.ability.netby web4-1.ability.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA17003Wed, 6 May 1998 10:56:40 -0400 (EDT)
        • James Clark - from mail1.ability.netby web4-1.ability.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA06202Wed, 6 May 1998 20:23:32 -0400 (EDT) <=