|
Subject: Re: Jade Backends (from The DSSSList Digest V2 #120) From: "Jean-Baptiste Nivoit" <jbnivoit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 18:44:09 -0400 |
> As Jean-Baptiste points out, one can get the PDF from the
>Postscript (if equipped with the appropriate commercial converter).
Well not even, Ghostscript support s device named PDFwrite that allows it
to transform PS into PDF (it also comes with a 'ps2pdf' shell script that
invokes
the interpreter with the adequate options).
>However, despite that, if I could only get one and got to pick which
>one, I would choose PDF, largely because it is better supported BY THE
>PARTICULAR GROUP of people I'm typically producing for (I decline to
>venture an opinion on the more general question).
I personnally would rather for PS first, since PDF is so easy to get after
(either with
GhostScript or the Adobe Distiller), whereas i can't think of anything that
translates
PDF into PS.
However i am not sure how GhostScript handles it when you have images
embedded
in the PostScript, i believe PS is less flexible than PDF on that matter..
> BTW, a decent plain ASCII (i.e. emailable in an SMTP message as
>formatted but not marked up plain text) would be even more useful.
>There are obvious issues with such functionality (what does one do with
>non-ASCII characters, for example). My current approach to this one is
>to use the RTF backend and then save the resulting file as text, which
>sort of works but is less than totally satisfactory.
You do want some formatting, though, right?
jb.
DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Jade Backends (from The DSSSLis, James Tauber | Thread | Re: Jade Backends (from The DSSSLis, Adam P. Harris |
| Re: Yet another newbie question, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: PostScript?, Jean-Baptiste Nivoit |
| Month |