Subject: Re: Recognizing "subdocuments" From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 11:58:12 -0600 |
At 04:05 PM 12/5/98 -0600, Brandon Ibach wrote: >> Examples of auxiliary groves are architectural instance groves, groves >> constructed by parsing character data into nodes (e.g., data tokenizer >> groves as defined by the HyTime standard), etc. >> So no joy there. >> > I guess it depends upon how you define "parse". If the document >that you're running sgml-parse on is named in the value of a node in >the existing grove, then would it not be reasonable to say that the >SGML Document node in the resulting grove would be the result of a >"parse" of the node which contained the reference? Therefore, the >SGML Document node would contain the "source" property as defined in >Section 9.5. > >-Brandon :) I think you must be joshing, but just in case you're not: no, it would only be an auxiliary grove if the thing parsed were the name itself (e.g., I construct a grove consisting of a list of character data nodes constructed from a string or token). If the name is used to find some source data (e.g., another SGML document entity) and then *that* is parsed, the result cannot be an auxiliary grove. Cheers, E. -- <Address HyTime=bibloc> W. Eliot Kimber, Senior Consulting SGML Engineer ISOGEN International Corp. 2200 N. Lamar St., Suite 230, Dallas, TX 75202. 214.953.0004 www.isogen.com </Address> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Recognizing "subdocuments", Brandon Ibach | Thread | Re: Recognizing "subdocuments", Brandon Ibach |
Re: What Happened to &#TAB; ?, Tony Graham | Date | Re: Line Break and global varaibles, Tony Graham |
Month |