RE: Background on DSSSL

[Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 24 Jun 1999 07:46 +0900, Frank A. Christoph wrote:
 > > I like the idea of DSSSL as an ISO/IEC standard, not least because it
 > > makes a solid point of reference.  However, whether it remains an ISO
 > > standard or not, everybody needs to keep speaking the same DSSSL
 > > dialect (or limited number of dialects) so that our DSSSL programs
 > > remain interoperable.
 > 
 > Then again, if there's only one implementation, who needs a standard?

If I'm optimistic, I can count (in no particular order):

  Jade 1.2.1
  OpenJade
  SENG
  Next Solution DSSSLPrint
  HyBrick
  DSC
  Netfolder SGML/XML Kit

Some of these are frozen, but whose to say the others won't be
"improved" over time?

Regards,


Tony Graham
======================================================================
Tony Graham                            mailto:tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9632
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist