Subject: RE: About the declare-flow-object-class From: "Frank A. Christoph" <christo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 09:00:06 +0900 |
> There are many places in the standard where things which are left > undefined or implementation-defined can be specified further via > a pubid; hyphenation-methods, line-breaking-methods, > line-composition-methods > come to mind. I agree wholeheartedly. It's a shame that DSSSL is so poorly specified when Scheme set such a wonderful example of rigor. > By the way, can anybody explain the difference between line-breaking > and line-composition to me ? I asked the same question on this list about a year ago, and there was no reply. It's a DSSSL mystery. Maybe the designers themselves had no clue...? --FC DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: About the declare-flow-object-c, Matthias Clasen | Thread | RE: About the declare-flow-object-c, Didier PH Martin |
RE: Finding the preceeding node., Avi Kivity | Date | RE: About the declare-flow-object-c, Frank A. Christoph |
Month |