Subject: Re: About Constructions rules From: Matthias Clasen <clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:13:31 +0200 |
> > I discovered that I made a typo. I probably did too much Omnimark this week > end because I called construction rules (as called in the DSSSL specs) > markup rules. Also, when I read again the specs, I found that I forgot some > construction rules like for instance (id...), (default...) and (query....). > > I am updating the document so that this time it has the right name for > construction rules and add the missing construction rules. But when I was > writing, a question came to my mind. Is the "query" construction rule > implemented in Jade? I never use it nor seen any example of it. I do not > even know what the style-expression-construct look like. Does anyone has an > idea? Even better, a small example I can show in the document. I wondered about that myself sometime ago. And no, query is not implemented. Its the only missing construct-expression. It may have been left out because this simplifies certain things. Eg, (current-node) will always be an element node unless you use query. The style-query-expression can be any expression returning a node-list, eg something like (q-element 'footnote (current-node)) returning all footnote elements within the current node. Note that (current-node) returns the root of the grove withing the style-query-expression. -- Matthias Clasen, Tel. 0761/203-5606 Email: clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mathematisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
About Constructions rules, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: About Constructions rules, Didier PH Martin |
RE: html to dsssl ?, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: Did I goof, once again ?, Jany Quintard |
Month |