Subject: RE: About Constructions rules From: Peter Nilsson <pnidv96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:22:32 +0200 (CEST) |
Hi, There have been some discussion about the semantics of the query-construction-rule. Brandon Ibach and Frank A Christoph explained this and the processing of nodes well, so I won't do anything about it. As Mathias Clasen siad, what I wanted to point out was that sgml-document node returned in Dieder PH Martins example would never be processed. Ofcourse, this is clearly stated in the specification and IMHO there is nothing open for "interpretation" here. I haven't read many standards at all, but I learned one thing. They are not written to be easy to read and one have to read them very carefully taking every word into account. Indoubtedly there are errors in the spec, but in general I find it very well written (but I'm no expert on how standards should be written...) Sory if I have a "teaching attitude", but I think we have to be very careful when we say that something is not specified and go out in fantasy land. Regards, /Peter -- '(?P . (?e . (?t . (?e . (?r))))) DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: About Constructions rules, Frank A. Christoph | Thread | RE: About Constructions rules, Didier PH Martin |
Re: DSSSL engine in LISP?, Alexander Taranov | Date | RE: About Constructions rules, Didier PH Martin |
Month |