Subject: RE: sgml-parse and GC From: Avi Kivity <Avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 11:10:30 +0300 |
On Tuesday, July 20, 1999 01:19, Brandon Ibach [SMTP:bibach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > Quoting Avi Kivity <Avi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > [Regarding an on-disk grove implementation with memory mapped files] > > What you would get is grove persistence over invocations of the style > > engine, which may or may not be a win. > > > Of course, this would be dependent on how well it was managed. For > instance, could we implement an effective "dependency" system, where > OpenJade would track the modification times and reparse a document > only when needed? Of course, the benefits of this would depend upon > the application. An application that has a lot of reuse of largely > static documents could probably benefit greatly. One that hardly ever > reuses a document without it changing would not benefit much, if at > all. I think it would be good to have, one way or another. > A large document composed of multiple subdocuments would surely benefit. Of course, simply tracking file time is not enough -- any included system entities would also have to be tracked. DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: sgml-parse and GC, Peter Nilsson | Thread | RE: sgml-parse and GC, Wilson, James.W |
reflection, Holger Klawitter | Date | Re: About Constructions rules, Matthias Clasen |
Month |