RE: sgml-parse

[Pieter Rijken <pieter.rijken@xxxxxx>]

Hi Brandon,

>    The reason that (children) and (descendants) return empty node
> lists when applied to the result of (sgml-parse) is that the result is
> a nodelist containing the "sgml-document" node which forms the root of
> the grove.  By definition, this node has no children.  The
> (process-children) procedure works around this by "pretending" that
> the "document-element" property contains the single child of the
> sgml-document.
>    The following alternative to (children) duplicates this:
> 	(define kids (lambda (#!optional (nd (current-node)))
> 	  (if (equal? 'sgml-document (node-property 'class-name nd))
>               (node-list-property 'document-element nd) 
> (children nd))))

Thank you very much!!!! This works as a 'tierelier' as we say in dutch!

pieter


-- 
Pieter Rijken                          E-mail: pieter.rijken@xxxxxx

CMG Telecommunications and Utilities B.V.
Division Advanced Technology
Nieuwekade 1-19
P.O. Box 8038                 Phone: +31 30 2339300
3503 RA Utrecht               Fax:   +31 30 2339495
The Netherlands
-------------------------------------------------------------------

DISCLAIMER: This statement is not an official statement from, nor
            does it represent an official position of, CMG
            Telecommunications and Utilities B.V.

------------------------------------------------------------------- 


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist