Subject: RE: support for 'macro' formatting languages From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:29:52 +0000 (GMT) |
Pieter Rijken writes: > I'm sorry if my reply wasn't put friendly. I didnt take it as unfriendly, I promise > The point i was trying to make was that when the (SGML) content > crosses multiple lines or even pages, it is hard for formatting > tools to figure out how to display it nicely. true. but if you like TeX's algorithms, get TeX to format the SGML. > But, for instance formula's are worse because the formula itself > does not 'group' terms. This information is absent and thus hard > for the formatter to do right the first time. as David says, MathML should let you explicitly say all this, and so NOT make TeX guess > I agree with you. One may also take the following view. Since TeX, people > are accustomed to very high quality formatting and printing and > would like to achieve that same high quality standard with SGML and DSSSL > as well..... thats fine. let someone write a formatting engine (learning all TeX's algorithms) that implements DSSSL. problem solved. at present we have pretty half-hearted bodges to implement DSSSL, but that can change. Yes, I am being serious, not denigrated jade etc. It is early days for DSSSL > P.S. I think the combination SGML + DSSSL is incredible powerfull and > certainly > don't think it is bad. no, but neither is it very good... yet! Sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: support for 'macro' formatting , David Carlisle | Thread | RE: support for 'macro' formatting , Peter Nilsson |
Re: support for 'macro' formatting , David Carlisle | Date | RE: support for 'macro' formatting , Pieter Rijken |
Month |