Subject: Re: [jats-list] Versions of an article From: Alf Eaton <eaton.alf@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 22:34:23 +0100 |
CrossRef did have a blog post about this a few years ago <http://crosstech.crossref.org/2010/02/does_a_crossref_doi_identify_a.html>, mentioning the possibility of updating the guidelines. It seems like DataCite has gone much further with allowing/recommending new DOIs for later versions of the same "work", perhaps because datasets are more likely to be updated over time. All this is helpful discussion, by the way - the choice of possible elements has expanded to "related-article", "self-uri" and/or "sub-article" :-) It's worth noting that the web, with URLs for each version and link relations in the HTML/HTTP headers[1], has pretty much solved this problem already, so mimicking those link relations in XML seems like the most straightforward answer. Alf [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5829 On 9 May 2013 22:12, Kevin Hawkins <kevin.s.hawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We need to distinguish between DOIs created through a membership in CrossRef > and other DOIs. Since many of us only use CrossRef for DOIs, we come to > think of their rules as being the only rules. > > The International DOI Foundation explicitly has no policy on whether you > should assign a new DOI when the content has changed slightly: > > http://www.doi.org/faq.html > > On the other hand, CrossRef's publisher rules ( > http://www.crossref.org/02publishers/59pub_rules.html ) says: > > 12. CrossRef only registers DOIs for Definitive Works (or Versions of > Record, if not formally published) but not for Duplicative Works, as defined > in the CrossRef Glossary. This means that only original scholarly material, > for which there is no actual DOI at the time of submission, and no expected > duplication in future, is admissible for CrossRef DOI registration. CrossRef > does not permit multiple DOIs to be assigned to certain closely related > versions of a work, and hence does not support assignment of DOIs to > Pre-prints or Post-prints of Definitive Works or to the Personal Version or > a Self-archived Copy of a Definitive Work. For the same reasons, materials > for which DOI duplication can be reasonably anticipated, such as an Authors > Original Draft of a work being prepared for publication, are not admissible > for CrossRef DOI registration. > > However, it appears that if you use CrossMark metadata, you can create more > than one DOI for the same published work as long as the proper CrossMark > metadata is attached to each of those DOIs. That appears to be the > mechanism used by F1000 Research. > > None of this, of course, answers Alf's original question. :) > > --Kevin
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [jats-list] Versions of an arti, Kevin Hawkins | Thread | [jats-list] References to standards, Alexander Schwarzman |
Re: [jats-list] Versions of an arti, Kevin Hawkins | Date | [jats-list] References to standards, Alexander Schwarzman |
Month |