Subject: [jats-list] PLOS blog about relative merits of XML (JATS) and HTML in workflows|
From: "Sheila M. Morrissey" <Sheila.Morrissey@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:24:46 -0400
Apologies for cross-posting, but I think this might be of interest to both of these lists. Molly Sharp, newly appointed product manager for content management at PLOS, has this post on the newly-created PLOS technology blog. http://blogs.plos.org/tech/structured-documents-for-science-jats-xml-as-canon ical-content-format/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed% 3A+plos%2Fblogs%2Fmain+%28Blogs+-+Main%29 Her query If XML is being used as an interchange format only, what do we gain from moving the XML piece of the workflow any further upstream from final delivery? Would be very interested in thoughts from members of these two lists. Sheila M. Morrissey Senior Research Developer ITHAKA 100 Campus Drive Suite 100 Princeton NJ 08540 609-986-2221 sheila.morrissey@xxxxxxxxxx ITHAKA (www.ithaka.org) is a not-for-profit organization that helps the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways. We provide innovative services that benefit higher education, including Ithaka S+R, JSTOR, and Portico.
|<- Previous||Index||Next ->|
|[jats-list] JATS-List Guidelines, Tommie Usdin||Thread||Re: [jats-list] PLOS blog about rel, Wendell Piez|
|[jats-list] JATS-List Guidelines, Tommie Usdin||Date||Re: [jats-list] PLOS blog about rel, Wendell Piez|