[jats-list] Re: <related-object> offlist

Subject: [jats-list] Re: <related-object> offlist
From: "Nikos Markantonatos nikos@xxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:04:09 -0000
I thought that my question on <related-object> would have a rather simple answer, but I guess not. So it's probably best to address it at the next JATS/BITS maintenance committee meeting.


On 07/24/2015 07:35 PM, Debbie Lapeyre wrote:
Great question!

And I can't wait to see PMC answer.

This element is theirs (I fought it in its current
form in JATS). The examples are also theirs. The
words are there by their request.

The whole thing has always seemed a bit off to me.

Thanks so much for asking!


Deborah A Lapeyre              mailto:dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.      http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street         Phone: 301-315-9631 (USA)
Suite 207                        Fax:   301-315-8385
Rockville, MD 20850
Mulberry Technologies: Consultancy for XML, XSLT, and Schematron

Confidentiality Notice: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contain information that may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this communication by someone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.

Current Thread