Re: [jats-list] Tagging a video introduction

["Pieter Lamers pieter.lamers@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi guys,

We've had one such case yet. We experienced problems with receiving 
parties that could not work with the information when tagged as a 
separate abstract. We ended up doing the following:

 B B B B B B B B B B B  <abstract>

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  <title>Abstract</title>

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  <p id="abstract-p1">

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.18008.dem.video"; xlink:title="Abstract" specific-use="print"/>

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  <media id="abstract-1" mime-subtype="mp4" mimetype="video" position="anchor" xlink:href="https://benjamins.com/catalog/tis.18008.dem/video/abstract.mp4"; specific-use="web">

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  <caption>

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  <p>Sign language version of the abstract</p>

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  </caption>

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  </media>

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  </p>

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  <p id="abstract-p2">This article rethinks the impact of sign language interpreting services (SLIS) as a social institution. It starts

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  from the observation that baccessb for deaf people is tantamount to availability of sign language interpreters, and the often

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  uncritically proposed and largely accepted solution at the institutional level to lack of access seems to be increasing the number

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  of interpreters. Using documented examples from education and health care settings, we raise concerns that arise when SLIS become

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  a prerequisite for public service provision. In doing so, we problematize SLIS as replacing or concealing the need for

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  language-concordant education and public services. We argue that like any social institution, SLIS should be studied and analyzed

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  critically. This includes more scrutiny about how different kinds of baccessesb can be implemented without SLIS, and more

 B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B  awareness of the contextual languaging choices deaf people make beyond the use of interpreters.</p>

 B B B B B B B B B B B  </abstract>

All the best,
Pieter

On 02/04/2020 12:29, Alexander Schwarzman aschwarzman@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Thank you, Nikos!
>
> This is logical. I only mentioned @abstract-type="graphical" because
> the Tag Library suggests:
>     "graphical: A pictorial representation such as a picture or a video".
> I know that there are no prescribed values for the @abstract-type
> attribute; so, perhaps, using @abstract-type="video-introduction"
> makes this a little more palatable.
>
> --Sasha
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 4:12 AM Nikos Markantonatos nikos@xxxxxxxxxx
> <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello Sasha.
>>
>> In my view, this is an abstract of some sort, since it is all about a
>> summary of the findings in the article. The fact that it is not peer
>> reviewed does not make it less of an abstract. The distinction between
>> this and the regular peer-reviewed abstract(s) is up to the
>> @abstract-type to be made. Whether you mark this video intro as an
>> @abstract-type="graphical", or as @abstract-type="video", or as
>> @abstract-type="video-introduction", or as anything along these lines is
>> probably mostly up to you.
>>
>> Nikos
>>
>> On 4/1/20 11:07 PM, Alexander Schwarzman aschwarzman@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> Hello:
>>>
>>> Does anyone have an opinion on the most appropriate markup for a short
>>> video, where the authors introduce their paper and briefly describe
>>> their findings?
>>>
>>> Because this video is (1) not peer-reviewed and (2) may have different
>>> preservation requirements than the the peer-reviewed portion of the
>>> paper, I am a bit reluctant to treat such a video as an abstract of
>>> the "graphical" @abstract-type.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, such a video doesn't seem to quite fit the notion
>>> of <supplementary-material>.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> --Sasha
>>>
>>> Alexander ('Sasha') Schwarzman, Content Technology Architect
>>> phone: +1.202.416.1979 | e-mail: aschwarzman@xxxxxxx
>>> The Optical Society (OSA)
>>> 2010 Massachusetts Ave., NW
>>> Washington, DC 20036 USA
>>> www.osa.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Confidentiality Notice:  This email and any attachments are for the sole
>> use of the intended recipient(s) and contain information that may be
>> confidential and/or legally privileged.  If you have received this email
>> in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the
>> message.  Any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
>> communication by someone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
>>
> 

-- 
Pieter Lamers
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Postal Address: P.O. Box 36224, 1020 ME AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands
Visiting Address: Klaprozenweg 75G, 1033 NN AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands
Warehouse: Kelvinstraat 11-13, 1446 TK PURMEREND, The Netherlands
tel: +31 20 630 4747
web: www.benjamins.com