Subject: Re: [jats-list] NISO ALI adoption From: "Armin Günther ague@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:02:23 -0000 |
Thank you Mark! It is good to know that ALI is actually used in other systems. I was uncertain if there is any support for ALI at all. Best wishes Armin Armin GC<nther, Prof. Dr. PsychOpen, Managing Editor www.leibniz-psychology.org ZPID - Leibniz-Institut fC<r Psychologie ZPID - Leibniz Institute for Psychology UniversitC$tsring 15 D-54296 Trier - Germany Tel.: +49b651b201-2055 www.psychopen.eu Am Di., 12. Jan. 2021 um 16:32 Uhr schrieb Mark Donoghue m.donoghue@xxxxxxxx <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Armin, > > My understanding of the documentation is to avoid this when using ALI: > > <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"> > <ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"> > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref> > </license> > > I don't know why exactly -- probably because it's redundant and therefore > inelegant :-) > > Using ALI would be a good choice to indicate licenses that have a URI > because ALI is used in other systems i.e.: Crossref and CHORUS. > > Regards, > Mark > - -- --- ----- -------- ------------- > Mark Donoghue > IEEE > (732) 562-6045 > m.donoghue@xxxxxxxx > > IEEE - Advancing Technology for Humanity > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:39 AM Armin GC<nther ague@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I am thinking about whether we should use NISO ALI with JATS, especially >> for referencing to the public license (CC BY) of articles. I found this >> recommendation in the JATS documentation: >> >> JATS best practice is to omit the @xlink:href attribute from <license> if >>> a NISO ALI ali:license_ref> is used. >> >> see: >> https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/1.2/element/ali-license_ref.h tml >> >> However, I am not sure about the "if" part of this recommendation: Is >> it advisable (or when is it advisable) to use NISO ALI ( >> https://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0) ? My impression is that NISO ALI >> until now is not widely adopted/supported. >> >> Any thoughts on this? Thanks! >> >> Armin >> >> >> >> Armin GC<nther, Prof. Dr. >> PsychOpen, Managing Editor >> >> www.leibniz-psychology.org >> ZPID - Leibniz-Institut fC<r Psychologie >> ZPID - Leibniz Institute for Psychology >> UniversitC$tsring 15 >> D-54296 Trier - Germany >> Tel.: +49b651b201-2055 >> www.psychopen.eu >> JATS-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/JATS/JATS-List/> >> EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/jats-list/253780> (by >> email) >> > JATS-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/JATS/JATS-List/> > EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/jats-list/163663> (by > email <>)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [jats-list] NISO ALI adoption, Mark Donoghue m.dono | Thread | [jats-list] Call for contribution t, Melissa Harrison m.h |
Re: [jats-list] NISO ALI adoption, Mark Donoghue m.dono | Date | [jats-list] Call for contribution t, Melissa Harrison m.h |
Month |