[jats-list] <ack> versus <fn-group>

Subject: [jats-list] <ack> versus <fn-group>
From: "Matt Broadhead matt.broadhead@xxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 20:10:03 -0000
Hi there

We've been having an internal discussion about the way that <ack> is a special
case compared to the miscellaneous things that can be put in <fn-group>
(author contributions, COI, etc).
Does anyone know the reasoning behind this?

Yours

Matt
---
Message ends here. My email signature is below
Matt Broadhead (he/him/his)\xA0 |\xA0 Assistant publications manager\xA0 |\xA0
European Respiratory Society: https://ror.org/00c8n3h65
T: +44 1142672877\xA0 |\xA0 E: mailto:matt.broadhead@xxxxxxxxxx |\xA0 W:
https://publications.ersnet.org/
Check out the ERS Publications podcast:
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/ers-publications-podcasts/id419221801 |
https://open.spotify.com/show/0060fyBdyPROnlDw16AF7Z |
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNsNZBXL3Zk_Oq75WHoG0OifZyrQ0je98 |
https://soundcloud.com/erjpodcast |
https://feeds.soundcloud.com/users/soundcloud:users:124832544/sounds.rss

Current Thread