Subject: Re: Repost: Re: `High-level' format specifications with XSL? From: Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 02 Jul 1998 18:43:22 +0200 |
>>>>> Sean Mc Grath <digitome@xxxxxx> writes: > I think the SGML/XML world could do with a whole bunch of standard > DTDs for Scientific Publishing, Contracts, Memoranda etc. etc. that > unashamedly specify their display sematics. Then users of SGML/XML > could piggy-back on these back-ends by doing SGML-SGML transformations. Exactly. The whole thing was a bit fuzzy in my mind, but now I think I understand it much better. Thanks to everyone who replied. I strongly support this idea of having standard DTDs with pre-defined layouts. In fact, we already have one standard DTD with a pre-defined layout: HTML. kai -- You ate somebody? -- Just a leg. -- That's terrible! -- Not with mustard. (Terry Pratchett: Interesting Times) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Repost: Re: `High-level' format spe, Sean Mc Grath | Thread | Re: Repost: Re: `High-level' format, Paul Prescod |
Re: XSL and IE5, Frank Boumphrey | Date | Re: `High-level' format specificati, Stefan Trcek |
Month |