Subject: Re: EcmaScript, gone? From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 07:53:48 -0500 |
James Tauber wrote: > > There is a distinction to be drawn between scripts that describe the > behaviour of certain elements at the client end (how a header responds to a > mouseover event) with procedural parts of an XSL stylesheet (section > numbering). > > The ECMAScript part of XSL-NOTE was for the latter. The term "behaviour > sheets" I've always taken to mean the former. I agree that there is a distinction. I'm just not sure if it is profitable to make it any more. Just as today's web pages often have an "OnLoad" that can modify the look of the page for it is displayed, future pages might have an: OnLISTITEMStart( item ){ } which would manipulate the list item's flow objects. Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco Everything I touch turns into Python. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Extended characters in XT, James Tauber | Thread | Re: EcmaScript, gone?, James Tauber |
Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variati, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: Extended characters in XT, James Tauber |
Month |