Subject: Re: CSS + behavior vs. XSL (was: EcmaScript, gone?) From: Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1998 10:24:29 +0100 |
Paul Prescod wrote: > Well, CSS+DOM can probably do anything that needs to be done. In fact, the > DOM alone can probably do anything that needs to be done. The problem is > that the more of your information system you build into "scripts" or other > proprietary, ad hoc code, the less robust it is and the less reusable your > information is. So our goal ist build layers of "declarativeness" that > progressively relegate scripting to the margins. We work to replace ad > hocness with agreed-upon standards. XSL is one more layer of > declarativeness. After two or three years, we will look again to see what > people are using the DOM and scripts to do and ask what can be encoded > declaratively and push scripting back into the margins. Well, this long run program (where was the web three years ago ?) still depends on the will of W3C members. We have implementable solutions *now* on a very low-cost base and I wonder why we should invest 4 years of standardization for quite the same result... </Daniel> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL WD1.0: Numbering in the sou, Chris Lilley | Thread | Re: CSS + behavior vs. XSL (was: E, Paul Prescod |
Re: XSL WD1.0: Numbering in the sou, Andy Dent | Date | Re: XSL WD1.0: Numbering in the sou, James Clark |
Month |