Subject: Re: [A] : DTD for XSL Style-sheets From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 15:57:36 +0700 |
G. Ken Holman wrote: > was it considered to combine the two into something along the lines of: > > <!ELEMENT xsl:define-attribute-set EMPTY> > <!ATTLIST xsl:define-attribute-set > xsl:name NMTOKEN #REQUIRED > xsl:use NMTOKENS #IMPLIED > > > > to reduce the amount of element structure? Yes. > If so, what are the benefits of > the structure as decided? Using xsl:name rather than name would be inconsistent with xsl:define-constant and xsl:define-macro. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[A] : DTD for XSL Style-sheets, G. Ken Holman | Thread | [2.4.2] : Element Nodes - Original , G. Ken Holman |
Re: Comments and questions to follo, James Clark | Date | Re: [2.6.3] : Anchors - use of NCNa, James Clark |
Month |