|
Subject: Re: XSL Requirements (was: Microsoft extensions to XSL) From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 20:15:38 +0800 |
-----Original Message-----
From: Oren Ben-Kiki <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>My bet is that the formatting part of XSL would just wither away.
I hope not. If XML is going to be used for serious printing work, you need
XSL and not CSS.
Let me quote from Jon Bosak recently on xml-dev talking about the kind of
complexity needed by print publishing and planned for XSL:
That's not complex. Complex is multiple columns, interleaved column
sets with multiple text flows, footnote zones, synchronized
marginalia, math formatting, mixed vertical and horizontal writing
directions -- in other words, the stuff you need in order to do
genuinely internationalized automated print publishing.
James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.jtauber.com
Associate Researcher, Electronic Commerce Network
Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia
Maintainer of : www.xmlinfo.com, www.xmlsoftware.com and www.schema.net
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: XSL Requirements (was: Microsof, Chris Lilley | Thread | Re: XSL Requirements (was: Microsof, Oren Ben-Kiki |
| Re: XSL Requirements (was: Microsof, Daniel Glazman | Date | Including xsl:number as part of out, Glenn R. Kronschnabl |
| Month |