Subject: RE: why split? [was RE: XSL intent survey] From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 16:19:01 +0000 |
Hi. Sufficient for what purpose? Your purpose?... not mine :) I want a proxy, or at least the scriptable object currently available. Direct browsing is one mechanism, but not always ideal. Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 11/26/98 04:11:37 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: RE: why split? [was RE: XSL intent survey] [SNIP] Thus, there is no need to implement a XSL, DSSSL or xxxxL processor as a proxy, just a browser's MIME filter is sufficient. [SNIP] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: why split? [was RE: XSL intent , Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | RE: why split? [was RE: XSL intent , Didier PH Martin |
Re: XSL intent survey, Oren Ben-Kiki | Date | Re: XSL intent survey, XSL-List Owner |
Month |