|
Subject: RE: why split? [was RE: XSL intent survey] From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 16:19:01 +0000 |
Hi.
Sufficient for what purpose? Your purpose?... not mine :)
I want a proxy, or at least the scriptable object currently available.
Direct browsing is one mechanism, but not always ideal.
Cheers
Guy.
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 11/26/98 04:11:37 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject: RE: why split? [was RE: XSL intent survey]
[SNIP]
Thus, there is no need to implement a XSL, DSSSL or xxxxL processor as a
proxy, just a browser's MIME filter is sufficient.
[SNIP]
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: why split? [was RE: XSL intent , Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | RE: why split? [was RE: XSL intent , Didier PH Martin |
| Re: XSL intent survey, Oren Ben-Kiki | Date | Re: XSL intent survey, XSL-List Owner |
| Month |