Subject: Re: Stepping back, part two... From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 12:58:32 +0000 (GMT) |
Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx writes: > It comes as a great suprise to me that XSL is a print and not Web driven > style language, and if this is the W3Cs stated intent, they'd do well to > let the Web development community know. > I am very puzzled as to why you want to make this distinction. we have quite enough ghettos already without "Web vs print" becoming a battle. do you *like* conflict? XSL is a style language for XML, isnt it? what more do you need to say? do you think XML's only is for the Web? Sebastian Rahtz XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Stepping back, part two..., Guy_Murphy | Thread | RE: Stepping back, part two..., Pawson, David |
RE: Stepping back, part two..., Pawson, David | Date | Re: XSL intent survey, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Month |