Re: More entity confusion and my opinion on the right way

Subject: Re: More entity confusion and my opinion on the right way
From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 11:23:51 +0700
Andrew Bunner wrote:
> 
>   Here's what I don't understand about the entity-writing problem...
> 
>   If I include &amp; in my source document or stylesheet, I get &amp; in my
> result document (this is good since my result document is HMTL).
> 
>   If I include &quot; in my source document or stylesheet, I get " in the
> result document. Hmm. OK.

&quot; and " are equivalent.  I made XT use " in content; I could as
easily make it use &quot;.  Does anybody care one way or the other?

>   Of even greater confusion to me is if I include &copy; in my source document.
> In this case, I get an error... &copy; references an undefined entity. BUT, if
> I include &#169; in my source document, I get &copy; in the result document.
> 'Hooray!' I think to myself, this must mean that if I include an entity
> reference to an ascii code, it will get translated to the right HTML entity.

Right.  That's what XT does when you use the HTML namespace as the
result.
 
>   Wrong.
> 
>   &#32; (space) gets translated to the space character, not to &nbsp;

&nbsp; corresponds to &#160; not &#32;.

James



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread