Subject: Re: dl/dt/dd matching From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 03:57:12 -0600 |
James Clark wrote: > > Francois Belanger wrote: > > > > I'm scratching my head on this one. > > I've been scratching my head for years on this one. It's a problem in > DSSSL too. Actually, it very easy to solve if you solve it in the right place. You need to augment the input schema (DTD, XSchema, whatever) so that it can guide the grouping of things. <!ELEMENT DL (!DTITEM)> <!GROUP DTITEM (DT, DD)> Given this document: <DL> <DT>...</DT><DD>..</DD> <DT>...</DT><DD>..</DD> <DT>...</DT><DD>..</DD> <DT>...</DT><DD>..</DD> </DL> You get this tree: DL DLITEM DT DD DLITEM DT DD DLITEM DT DD DLITEM DT DD David Peterson may have invented this idea in the SGML context, but in retrospect it is a straightforward application of the computer science concept of "non-terminal" in a context-free-grammar. Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "I want to give beauty pageants the respectability they deserve." - Brooke Ross, Miss Canada International XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: dl/dt/dd matching, James Clark | Thread | Re: dl/dt/dd matching, Francois Belanger |
Re: Standard API to XSL processors, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: <xsl:template><xsl:value-of/></, Guy_Murphy |
Month |