Re: GOTCHA!

Subject: Re: GOTCHA!
From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:01:35 +0000
Hi Oren.

The MS XSL parser has <xsl:cdata> doing as you describe.

Whether MS is inovating or anticipating here is as always an interesting
point. Is anybody running a book of odds on these issues? I figure the list
as a collective could make some tidy money on the side ::cough:: maybe not.

Cheers
     Guy.





xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 01/13/99 10:17:52 PM

To:   xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc:    (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject:  Re: GOTCHA!




From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[SNIP]

Any reason we have <xsl:comment> and not <xsl:cdata>? Any chance we may get
<xsl:cdata>?
Have fun,
    Oren Ben-Kiki

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list






 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread