Subject: Re: Existing XSL processors From: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:45:12 +0100 |
Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hi Anette. > > The second part is pretty much up to the browsers. No more than the first part is. It is possible to implement the first part outside a browser, similarly the second part. If you also allow hyperlinks in the formatted output to be traversed, then you have a new browser. -- Chris XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Existing XSL processors, Guy_Murphy | Thread | Re: Existing XSL processors, James Tauber |
A general pattern match, Nic Williams | Date | Re: A general pattern match, G. Ken Holman |
Month |