|
Subject: Fw: Formal parameters for stylesheets From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:56:48 +0200 |
Jason Diamond <sendangels@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>A processor could actually support parameters without changing the spec. If
a
>user did something like this on the command line:
>
>xt -Dfoo=bar test.xml test.xsl
>
>The processor could interpret that as inserting a:
>
><xsl:constant name="foo" value="bar"/>
>
>into the stylesheet. Maybe a {parameter(foo)} function would actually help
so
>that users don't confuse the two concepts, though.
If this is done, not only should that be "{parameter(foo)}", but there
should be an explicit declaration:
<xsl:parameter name="foo" default="..."/>
Somewhere in the stylesheet. Otherwise all hell would break loose when
combining stylesheets, writing GUI for XSL processors, doing DTD
verifications...
Share & Enjoy,
Oren Ben-Kiki
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Formal parameters for styleshee, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: Fw: Formal parameters for style, Jason Diamond |
| Re: Formal parameters for styleshee, Jason Diamond | Date | Expanding QNames in ElementExpressi, Tyler Baker |
| Month |