Subject: RE: Practical XSL From: regan@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 09:46:00 -0800 |
We (KnowMed Systems) are going to release the next version of our software (a very high-end Electronic Medical Record system, although I don't think that's the term our marketing department uses :) ) due out in April with some applicable parts of our functionality rewritten to use XML/XSL. So, I think that pretty serious. -Regan Gill regan@xxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: James Tauber [mailto:jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 5:11 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Practical XSL >Is anyone doing anything serious with XSL yet? If not (for those who >decide these things) when is it likely that we shall be able to reliably >use XSL? I don't know if you'd call it "serious" but my XML sites are generated using XSL stylesheets (using XT, make and soon a touch of SAXON to split files) James -- James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.jtauber.com Associate Researcher, Electronic Commerce Network Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia Full-day XML Tutorial @ WWW8 : http://www8.org/ Maintainer of : www.xmlinfo.com, www.xmlsoftware.com and www.schema.net XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Practical XSL, James Tauber | Thread | Trouble with tables, Richard Lander |
Flight of fantasy..., Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: Fw: CSS and XSL, Chris Lilley |
Month |