Subject: Re: Why Doesn't IE5 use the DTD to Validate? From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 12:40:53 -0600 |
Jeff Greif wrote: > > I'm hesitant to enter this thread since I'm far from an expert, but... > > The problem is that the browser is really a processing application, for > example, using XSL to transform or render the document (at least in > principle). If the document is supposed to conform to a DTD, the XSL code > will be a lot simpler if it can assume it will find what it wants where it > expects it. I agree totally. But that's not what Chris said. He said that without the DTD there "is no parse tree." That isn't true on a technical level. I would be the last person to argue against the *value* of a DTD and the value of validating against the DTD before displaying a document. I did point out in my last message that a bug in the XML spec. makes the IE 5.0 behavior fairly defensible. Just because a DTD is there does not mean that it is meant to be complete. If it is not meant to be complete then reporting that is not very useful to anyone. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "Other Operating Environments Will Have Trouble Keeping up with Linux's Growth" - http://www.idc.com/Data/Software/content/SW033199PR.htm International Data Corporation bulletin XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Why Doesn't IE5 use the DTD to, Jeff Greif | Thread | Re: Why Doesn't IE5 use the DTD to, Chris Lilley |
Re: Why Doesn't IE5 use the DTD to, Jeff Greif | Date | Re: Why Doesn't IE5 use the DTD to, Rick Geimer |
Month |