Subject: Re: XSL as a better XPointer was RE: The Cathedral and the Bizarre (was: do you use pi's?) From: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 19:35:53 +0200 |
Jonathan Borden wrote: > However, we see that with a few extensions, namely XQL, the XSL pattern > matching language (language #3) can serve as an effective XML pointer > description language. A range is a funny sort of 'pointer' in any case, it > corresponds to a paired start location/pointer and end location/pointer. > This can be expressed as a pair of XSL/XQL patterns. Its not "funny"; it just means that the thing pointed to is not an entity. Thus, it indeed needs a pair of pointers. Two individual points is not the same as a range, although both may be indicated in the same way; how does XQL indicate two points (two pointers) as opposed to a range (pair of pointers)? -- Chris XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL as a better XPointer was RE, Jonathan Borden | Thread | Re: The Cathedral and the Bizarre , James Tauber |
apache,perl,xml,xsl, Matthew MacKenzie | Date | XPointer and XSL pattern unificatio, Sharon Adler |
Month |