Subject: Re: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues (was: several threads) From: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 22:24:25 +0200 |
Jelks Cabaniss wrote: > But how to do it? If XML 1.1 has a "valid='yes'|'no'" in the declaration, XML > 1.1 documents may break when running under an XML 1.0 parser, since the XML 1.0 > BNF clearly states what can and can't be in the declaration. But they would also notice the version="1.1" as well, and either stop or ignore stuff they didn't understand... > Maybe a PI could be formalized similar to the way the stylesheetX-MozillaX-Mozilla-Status: 8018 > <?xml-assert implementation="valid"?> > > (could also be "minimal" or "full" for the well-formed only options you > mentioned). I think the chance of doing this extension via a PI is minimal. -- Chris XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues , Chris Lilley | Thread | Re: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues , Simon St.Laurent |
Re: Building a new tree, Chris Lilley | Date | Java1.2 Swing and IE5.0beta, hyflam |
Month |