Subject: Fw: XSL macros stronger then XSLT From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 16:29:16 +0200 |
David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >according to sec 13 a variable can have value any type allowed in an >XSLT expression. I think the idea is that instead of the old contents >form you use a named parameter and then grab its value with ><xsl:copy-of select="$paramname" /> Hey, neat idea - Silly me, I never thought of using <xsl:copy-of> to get at a variable containing a node set. Unfortunately, XT does not support this. When I tried the following: <xsl:template name="Wrapper"> <xsl:element name="W"> <xsl:copy-of select="$Content"/> </xsl:element> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="C"> <xsl:call-template name="Wrapper"> <xsl:param name="Content"> <xsl:attribute name="B">b value</xsl:attribute> </xsl:param> </xsl:call-template> </xsl:template> I got the following error message: DID NOT EXPECT cannot convert to node-set I hope this is just a problem in XT (the current version is clearly marked as a beta, it is to be expected that there are some glitches). Well, that's what beta testers are for :-) Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL macros stronger then XSLT, Kay Michael | Thread | Re: Fw: XSL macros stronger then XS, David Carlisle |
RE: Dinky little XML and XSL GIFs f, Mike Dierken | Date | RE: < and >, Sharmila Pandith |
Month |