Subject: Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script... From: Rick Geimer <rick.geimer@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 16:43:08 -0700 |
David Carlisle wrote: > > The biggest problem for me, which I have brought up on this list before, is the lack > > of support for entity attributes. > > OK fair enough it's clear there is currently no support for those. > But just as clearly if they are needed, one could loby for explicit > support to be added to XSL without just adding arbitrary procedural > code in script tags, so it is not really an argument for script is it? No, it is an argument for complete support of the XML spec. I would prefer this to a script tag any day. Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:s, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:s, Duane Nickull |
OO and scripting, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: <xsl-script>, Rick Geimer |
Month |