RE: [Fwd: Re: Language is not markup and markup is not language.]

Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: Language is not markup and markup is not language.]
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 09:17:37 +0100
> From: David LeBlanc [mailto:whisper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> 
> Can you write an XSL processor in XSL? If so, I would agree 
> it's Turing complete; otherwise not.
> 
You are suggesting that the statements "XSL is turing complete" and "An XSL
processor can be written in XSL" are equivalent. Another interesting
assertion, can you prove or justify it?

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread