Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: Language is not markup and markup is not language.] From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 09:17:37 +0100 |
> From: David LeBlanc [mailto:whisper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Can you write an XSL processor in XSL? If so, I would agree > it's Turing complete; otherwise not. > You are suggesting that the statements "XSL is turing complete" and "An XSL processor can be written in XSL" are equivalent. Another interesting assertion, can you prove or justify it? Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [Fwd: Re: Language is not marku, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: [Fwd: Re: Language is not marku, Chris Maden |
XLink: behavior must go!, Martin Bryan | Date | RE: size?, Kay Michael |
Month |