|
Subject: Re: Leventhal's challenge misses the point From: "Guy Murphy" <guy-murphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 14:22:43 +0100 |
Hi Heikii
Are you suggesting then that the Web is safer if we mandate DOM+ECMAScript
with CSS as the standard means for styling XML?
My personal concern for the safety of the Web is the DOM+ECMAScript part.
I personally am suprised and concernced at the thought that a browser vendor
feels that mandating a scripting language as an adjunct to a styling
language for styling is best for the Web.
Cheers
Guy.
>
> Not personally, he feels the Web is threatened.
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Leventhal's challenge misses th, James Clark | Thread | RE: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Miles Sabin |
| Re: XSL for non-programmers, Dieter Maurer | Date | Re: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Guy Murphy |
| Month |