Re: My response to Leventhal's article...

[Stephen Deach <sdeach@xxxxxxxxx>]

Look at the "Link and Multi Formatting Objects" Sections 4.1.6 and 4.8


At 09:19 1999-05-29 +0100, Ian Hickson wrote:
>On Fri, 28 May 1999, Stephen Deach wrote:
>
>> Claim 2.) XSL precludes interactivity. -- No more so than CSS.
>
>How is the following CSS expressed in XSL?
>
>   BUTTON { border: thin outset solid; } 
>   BUTTON:hover { border: medium outset solid; }
>   BUTTON:focus { outline: dotted; }
>   BUTTON:active { border: medium inset solid; }
>
>[I ask this purely out of interest. Originally I was 'against' XSL, but
>all the arguments I have heard so far have basically made me XSL-neutral:
>I am in favour of XSLT, and dubious about the FOs.]
>
>-- 
>Ian Hickson 
>U+2642 U+2651
>U+262E U+2603 U+263A
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
  Stephen Deach                            |  Sr Computer Scientist
  408-536-6521 (office)                    |  Adobe Systems Inc.
  408-537-4214 (fax)                       |  Mail Stop E15-420
  sdeach@xxxxxxxxx                         |  345 Park Ave
                                           |  San Jose, CA 95110-2704
                                           |  USA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list