Subject: Re: Unicode and XSL (was substring()) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 10:00:50 +0100 (BST) |
James Clark writes > The XML Rec defines what a character is for XML and that is what we > should count. Yes I'd agree with that. Perhaps you need to rename normalize() to normalize-white-space() and then have a (perhaps optional, extension) function that is normalize-characters-according-to-whatever-w3c-finally-decide-is-best-scheme() Perhaps not quite those names, but in a world where character normalisation seems to be becoming more important, the current normalize() function name might not really have the right connotations? David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Unicode and XSL (was substring(, James Clark | Thread | Re: Unicode and XSL (was substring(, David Carlisle |
RE: sample file, Christian Wittern | Date | error installing xml-parser, Lawrence Mielniczuk |
Month |