Subject: Re: CSS and XSL? From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 13:12:36 -0400 |
At 09:31 AM 6/10/99 -0700, you wrote: >>It seems like the W3C could have avoided this split and the crazy debates >>that have followed it by making XSL and CSS work together, not separately. > >The debate would have just been the other way around. People who wanted >transformations would have just been the ones crying foul. The point here isn't that transformations shouldn't have happened - it's that you could at least use the same formatting vocabulary for CSS and for XSL FO's. XSL-T raises its own issues, but making it coexist with CSS isn't very difficult. I don't think there would have been a debate at all, actually, or at least much less of a debate. Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical (July) Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: CSS and XSL?, Chuck White | Thread | Re: CSS and XSL?, Chuck White |
Re: CSS and XSL?, Chuck White | Date | RE: How can i parse a xml-file with, Kay Michael |
Month |