Re: XSL FO DTD problems

[Rick Geimer <rick.geimer@xxxxxxx>]

Betty,

Xmetal handles SGML as well as XML, so it wouldn't necessarily report any
problems. I was getting errors for mixed content models that use #PCDATA in
places that are not allowed by XML, as well as things like inclusions.

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@xxxxxxx

"Betty L. Harvey" wrote:

> Rick:
>
> What are the errors you are receiving?  I parsed the DTD
> with XMetaL without any problem.
>
> Betty
>
> /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
> Betty Harvey                         | Phone: 301-540-8251 FAX: 4268
> Electronic Commerce Connection, Inc. |
> 13017 Wisteria Drive, P.O. Box 333   |
> Germantown, Md.  20874               |
> harvey@xxxxxxxxxx                    | Washington,DC SGML/XML Users Grp
> URL:  http://www.eccnet.com          | http://www.eccnet.com/sgmlug/
> /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/
>
> On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Rick Geimer wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is it my imagination, or is the DTD for XSL formatting objects (from the
> > following URL) an invalid XML DTD?
> >
> >     http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl/#AEN7695
> >
> > I tried parsing it with the XML parser in IE5, and IBM's XML4C parser,
> > and neither one accepted. However, it seems to be a valid SGML DTD.
> >
> > Does anyone know if there is a valid XML version of this DTD, or if
> > there are plans to updated it for XML compliance?
> >
> > Rick Geimer
> > National Semiconductor
> > rick.geimer@xxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list