Subject: Re: XSLT vs JSP From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:06:09 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > Chuck Robey writes: > > Troff (or groff, actually) is still being used to write books. That's > > too bad, > > why is that bad? what is wrong with using a high-quality, flexible, > stable tool for the job? Oh, I find nothing wrong with the tool, Sebastian, but I wish there could be a standard markup to be used with such a tool, so that the sources could be standardized. *authors*, not even editors, use troff ... if it is that simple, why cannot W3C make a markup system that is simple enough to describe it? > > sebastian > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 213 Lakeside Drive Apt T-1 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run picnic and jaunt, both FreeBSD-current. (301) 220-2114 | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSLT vs JSP, Chuck Robey | Thread | Re:RE: XSLT vs JSP, KAREN_LEICHEL |
Re: XSLT vs JSP, Chuck Robey | Date | |
Month |