Subject: Re: AW: XSL Tools From: Toivo Lainevool <tlainevool@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 09:39:45 -0700 (PDT) |
--- john.markor@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > This bring up an interesting point. Is there an advantage to saving the HTML file and > delivering a static version to a browser rather than a dynamic version delivered on the fly > using XSL and, say IE5 (just for an example.) > > I've always been under the impressiion that the dynamic delivery is preferable from a management > standpoint - could I be wrong here? I can think of two reason too have static pages 1) speed, static pages are delivered faster than generated pages 2) bot searches - some search engine bots won't find generated pages, if you want the pages to be listed in search engines it's best to have them static Toivo Lainevool _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: AW: XSL Tools, Don Park | Thread | Re: Who uses XSLT?, Rick Geimer |
Re: Who uses XSLT?, Rick Geimer | Date | Re: XSL-WG solicits comments on FO , Rick Geimer |
Month |