Re: AW: XSL Tools

Subject: Re: AW: XSL Tools
From: Toivo Lainevool <tlainevool@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 09:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
--- john.markor@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> This bring up an interesting point.  Is there an advantage to saving the HTML file and
> delivering a static version to a browser rather than a dynamic version delivered on the fly
> using XSL and, say IE5 (just for an example.)
> I've always been under the impressiion that the dynamic delivery is preferable from a management
> standpoint - could I be wrong here?

I can think of two reason too have static pages 
1) speed, static pages are delivered faster than generated pages
2) bot searches - some search engine bots won't find generated pages, if you want the pages to be
listed in search engines it's best to have them static

Toivo Lainevool

Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free address at

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread