Subject: fo:sequence-specification question From: "Hadar, Oren" <ohadar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:01:29 -0400 |
Hello, I am a bit confused about the April draft spec's definition of fo:sequence-specification (which I abbreviate in this message to 'fo:s-s') According to the spec, a single fo:s-s can contain any number and combination of fo:s-s-singles, fo:s-s-repeatings, and fo:s-s-afternatings, in any order. But how does this work? For example, how can I have an fo:s-s with an fo:s-s-repeating followed by an fo:s-s-alternating? My understanding is that at this point we don't have a way to explicitly associate different fo:flows with different fo:simple-page-masters - so wouldn't the fo:flow defined in the fo:page-layout containing the fo:s-s simply flow entirely into the repeating sequence (because it's the first in my fo:s-s)? Will the 'dangling' alternating sequence just be ignored? If my understanding is correct, it would seem multiple fo:s-s-singles could be used in the same fo:s-s (since they just represent a single page), but only at the beginning of the sequence (otherwise, they'd dangle and be ignored). So is it fair to make the following rules for an fo:s-s? 1. You can have as many s-s-singles as you want, but they must be grouped together at the beginning of the sequence. 2. You can only have one of either s-s-alternating or s-s-repeating, and it must be the last in the sequence. Thanks for any insight anyone can provide. Oren Hadar Application Designer Interleaf, Inc. ohadar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (781) 768-1082 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Question about formatDate method, Eggenkamp, M.E.W. | Thread | Re: fo:sequence-specification quest, James Tauber |
Question about formatDate method, Eggenkamp, M.E.W. | Date | Re: Microsoft's take on XSL, David Carlisle |
Month |