RE: xslt and sax

Subject: RE: xslt and sax
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 12:52:39 +0100
> So far, none of the existing XSLT implementations have been 
> too concerned with performance

Not true. I put a lot of work into SAXON performance, and I'm sure James
Clark has too, because I used xt as my benchmark. That's not to say there
aren't further improvements possible, especially in optimising the more
difficult XSLT constructs such as xsl:number.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread
  • xslt and sax
    • Mark D. Anderson - Sun, 19 Sep 1999 09:48:42 -0700
      • zun - Sun, 19 Sep 1999 17:05:16 -0400 (EWT)
      • Jon Smirl - Sun, 19 Sep 1999 17:33:22 -0400
      • <Possible follow-ups>
      • Kay Michael - Mon, 20 Sep 1999 12:48:27 +0100
      • Kay Michael - Mon, 20 Sep 1999 12:52:39 +0100 <=