Subject: Re: Parents disinherit their children From: pandeng@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Steve Schafer) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 15:39:26 GMT |
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999 10:48:49 -0400, you wrote: >However, I'm concerned about the logical inconsistency in this >statement as currently written. In common usage, both technical and >genealogical, the statement that A is the parent of B clearly implies >that B is the child of A. Why is this common understanding of >language broken here? Is there anything that can be done to fix it? Perhaps it would be better to say that a node is the "owner" of its attributes and the "parent" of its children. -Steve Schafer XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Parents disinherit their children, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Thread | Re: Parents disinherit their childr, James Tauber |
BookMaster XML/XSL, Michel Goossens | Date | Re: Parents disinherit their childr, James Tauber |
Month |