Subject: Re: OT: XML Server dream From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 20:16:12 +0200 |
Liam R. E. Quin <liamquin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have seen 3 basic approaches. Of these, one approach almost never > works, or if it does, dramatically increases sales of snacks and > coffee while people wait for a response when it's used. > > The approaches are > (1) decompose every element into a field in a relational or OO database... > (2) decompose down to paragraphs, but store mixed content as blobs... > (3) store documents in flat files... > There are many varioations on these. What we do is (2) + (1); we store each "document" as a blob, but we first extract key data from it and use it to create indices for fast queries. This works for very unstructured documents, as long as one is willing to accept documents which have no value for a key. And, of course, you need to be able to extract the key from the document, and know the set of relevant keys in advance. It is a very natural extension of the normal SQL practice of declaring indices based on record fields. I wouldn't be surprised to see it in "XML databases". Until then, it is pretty easy to simulate. Share & Enjoy, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: OT: XML Server dream, Liam R. E. Quin | Thread | Re: OT: XML Server dream, Eric van der Vlist |
RE: Calculations in XSL, disco | Date | Re: OT: XML Server dream, Eric van der Vlist |
Month |