Re: Select on Text Node, XML Out of Ancestors

Subject: Re: Select on Text Node, XML Out of Ancestors
From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 17:25:16 -0800
At 99/11/01 07:48 -0500, I wrote:
At 99/11/01 09:36 -0500, John Robert Gardner wrote:
I'm looking to select (ultimately extract) all the records with subfield
0039-310X,

I think David has given you the best answer.

I hadn't received James' post before posting the above. His is equally appropriate since it is using a predicate to test the candidacy of a node.


I wonder which of the two would have the fastest execution time.

........... Ken

--
G. Ken Holman                    mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Crane Softwrights Ltd.             http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0   +1(613)489-0999   (Fax:-0995)
Web site: XSL/XML/DSSSL/SGML services, training, libraries, products.
Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath      ISBN 1-894049-02-0
Next instructor-led training:  1999-11-08, 1999-11-09, 1999-12-05/06,
-                1999-12-07, 2000-02-27/28, 2000-05-11/12, 2000-05-15


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread