Subject: RE: preceding-sibling on sorted nodes From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 11:37:58 -0000 |
> When sorting using XT the preceding-sibling axis seems to > operate on the nodes in source tree order not in sorted order. Is this > correct behavior? Yes, it's correct. > > I'm not sure how to workaround this, since I'm trying to do > grouping after sorting and using preceding-sibling is the only way I know of to do > grouping. Doing sorting and then grouping the sorted result is not easy. SAXON has a proprietary feature to do it, called saxon:group, but of course many people don't want to stray outside the standard. I think there are examples on one of the tutorial sites, or in the archives of this list, showing how to do it using a recursive call-template approach. But beware, this may not perform well! Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
preceding-sibling on sorted nodes, Mark Hayes | Thread | node() grouping, Earl Bingham |
a newbie question, TaNiA | Date | RE:, Kay Michael |
Month |