Subject: Re: undefined behavior (was document(a,b) for b not a singleton node set) From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 19:40:17 +0700 |
Kay Michael wrote: > - the spec doesn't say whether a Processing Instruction in a stylesheet is > an error or should be ignored or is a permitted way of doing vendor > extensions. (Actually it doesn't say anything about comments either, or if > it does I've missed it.) Section 3, paragraph 2: "Processing instructions and comments in the stylesheet are ignored: the stylesheet is treated as if neither processing instruction nodes nor comment nodes were included in the tree that represents the stylesheet." James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: undefined behavior (was documen, Kay Michael | Thread | RE:conformance, David_Marston |
RE: undefined behavior (was documen, Kay Michael | Date | Where is XSL Format 1.0 specificati, David ROBERT |
Month |